CalMat Co. v. Old Castle Precast, Inc. et al
ORDER by District Judge Kenneth J. Gonzales denying 162 Rune Kraft's Notice to the Court, the Chief Judge of the Court and the Chief Judge of the Tenth Circuit and Motion to Void All Rulings Issued in the Case. (tah)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
Civ. No. 16-26 KG/WPL
OLDCASTLE PRECAST, INC.,
and JOHN DOES 1-5,
ORDER REGARDING (DOC. 162)
This matter comes before the Court upon Rune Kraft’s “Notice to the Court, the Chief
Judge of the Court and the Chief Judge of the Tenth Circuit and Motion to Void All Rulings
Issued in the Case” (Motion), filed on May 26, 2017. (Doc. 162). Rune Kraft generally
contends that Defendant Oldcastle Precast, Inc. (Oldcastle) is not serving its motions on him and
that the Court is not serving its orders on him. Consequently, Rune Kraft seeks an order voiding
all rulings by the Court.
The Court notes first that Oldcastle’s counsel certifies in Oldcastle’s motions for
summary judgment and sanctions that he either mailed or e-mailed copies of the motions to Rune
Kraft. (Doc. 148) at 11; (Doc. 158) at 6. Second, the Court notes that because Rune Kraft is no
longer a party to this lawsuit the Court is not required to automatically serve on him every order
it enters. Nevertheless, the Court served on Rune Kraft those orders which pertain to him. For
example, the Court mailed (Docs. 145, 146, 147, and 132) to Rune Kraft, and e-mailed him
(Docs. 126 and 129). See Staff Notes entered on April 14, 2017, and May 31, 2017, and Notice
of Electronic Filings for (Docs. 126 and 129). For the above reasons, the Court finds that
the Motion (Doc. 162) is not well-taken and is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?