Thymes v. Verizon Wireless, Inc. et al

Filing 127

ORDER by Magistrate Judge William P. Lynch granting 125 Motion for Extension of Time to respond. (mej)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO CARL G. THYMES, Plaintiff, v. CV 16-66 KG/WPL VERIZON WIRELESS, INC., and CARLOS RESTREPO, Defendants. ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME Pro se Plaintiff Carl Thymes filed a document entitled “Leave of Court to File Opposition to Defendant Motions to Compel Declaration of Facts in Support of Opposition Docs 117, 118, 119.” (Doc. 125.) Under the circumstances, I construe this as a motion to extend the time in which Thymes may file a response in opposition to Verizon’s motions to compel (Docs. 100, 101). The motions to compel were filed on January 24, 2017. Because Thymes receives electronic service, he had fourteen days in which to file a response. D.N.M.LR-Civ. 7.4(a). I remind Thymes that he is required to comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules in prosecuting this case. In this instance only, I grant Thymes’s motion for an extension of time. Thymes may file his responses to the two motions to compel no later than 5:00 p.m. on February 24, 2017. No additional extensions will be allowed. IT IS SO ORDERED. ___________________________________ William P. Lynch United States Magistrate Judge A true copy of this order was served on the date of entry--via mail or electronic means--to counsel of record and any pro se party as they are shown on the Court’s docket.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?