Thymes v. Verizon Wireless, Inc. et al
Filing
127
ORDER by Magistrate Judge William P. Lynch granting 125 Motion for Extension of Time to respond. (mej)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
CARL G. THYMES,
Plaintiff,
v.
CV 16-66 KG/WPL
VERIZON WIRELESS, INC., and
CARLOS RESTREPO,
Defendants.
ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME
Pro se Plaintiff Carl Thymes filed a document entitled “Leave of Court to File Opposition
to Defendant Motions to Compel Declaration of Facts in Support of Opposition Docs 117, 118,
119.” (Doc. 125.) Under the circumstances, I construe this as a motion to extend the time in
which Thymes may file a response in opposition to Verizon’s motions to compel (Docs. 100,
101). The motions to compel were filed on January 24, 2017. Because Thymes receives
electronic service, he had fourteen days in which to file a response. D.N.M.LR-Civ. 7.4(a). I
remind Thymes that he is required to comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the
Local Rules in prosecuting this case.
In this instance only, I grant Thymes’s motion for an extension of time. Thymes may file
his responses to the two motions to compel no later than 5:00 p.m. on February 24, 2017. No
additional extensions will be allowed.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
___________________________________
William P. Lynch
United States Magistrate Judge
A true copy of this order was served
on the date of entry--via mail or electronic
means--to counsel of record and any pro se
party as they are shown on the Court’s docket.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?