De La Fuente Guerra v. Winter et al
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Laura Fashing denying as moot 42 Motion to Compel Discovery. (ccp)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
“ROCKY” ROQUE DE LA FUENTE GUERRA,
MAGGIE TOULOUSE OLIVER,
New Mexico Secretary of State,
ORDER DENYING AS MOOT MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY (Doc. 42)
THIS MATTER comes before the Court on defendant’s Motion to Compel Discovery
(Doc. 42). Plaintiff filed a response (Doc. 43), and the time for defendant to file a reply has now
passed. Having reviewed the motion, response, and the applicable law, the Court finds the
motion moot, and it will be DENIED.
In the motion to compel, defendant asks the Court to require plaintiff to answer
Defendant’s First Set of Interrogatories and First Set of Requests for Production of Documents.
Doc. 42 at 1. Defendant’s counsel admits in the motion that he conferred with plaintiff’s
attorney Paul Rossi, and agreed not to file the motion to compel as long as plaintiff produced
answers and responses by the close of business on Friday, April 21, 2017. Id. at 2. In the
response, Mr. Rossi states that he delivered plaintiff’s answers and responses at 12:30 p.m. on
April 21, 2017— before the agreed-upon deadline. 1 The Court therefore finds the Motion to
Compel moot, and declines to award attorney fees and costs.
The Albuquerque Attorney General’s Office accepted service of the answers and responses, and
advised Mr. Rossi that they would notify Mr. Lange of this fact. See Doc. 43 at 2. It appears
that this notification was not timely made.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that defendant’s Motion to Compel Discovery is
DENIED AS MOOT.
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?