Samadi v. Social Security Administration
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Fouratt granting 24 Unopposed Motion for Attorney Fees Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act. (kdj)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
Civ. No. 16-402 GJF
NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting
Commissioner of the Social Security
ORDER FOR THE AWARD OF ATTORNEY FEES
PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT
THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Plaintiff’s “Unopposed Motion for Attorney
Fees and Costs Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act” (“Motion”) filed on June 20, 2017
[ECF No. 24]. The parties have stipulated to EAJA fees in the amount of $5,114.50 for work
performed in 2015 and 2016. The Court, having reviewed the Motion, the record, and noting the
concurrence of the parties, finds the Motion to be well taken and will hereby GRANT it.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff is awarded $5,114.50 in attorney fees
pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). See Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S.
586, 591-93 (2010) (EAJA fees are paid to the prevailing party, not the attorney). Plaintiff is
also awarded $400.00 in costs, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1920, which shall be paid from the
Payment of this amount shall constitute a complete release from and bar to any and all
claims Plaintiff may have relating to EAJA fees in connection with this action. The parties
further agree that the EAJA award is without prejudice to Plaintiff’s attorney’s right to seek
attorney fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), subject to the offset provisions of the EAJA. See
28 U.S.C. § 2412(c)(1) (2012).
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if Plaintiff’s counsel receives attorney fees under
both the EAJA and 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) of the Social Security Act, Plaintiff’s counsel shall refund
the smaller award to Plaintiff pursuant to Weakley v. Bowen, 803 F.2d 575, 580 (10th Cir. 1986).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
THE HONORABLE GREGORY J. FOURATT
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?