Guinn v. Social Security Administration

Filing 19

STIPULATED ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar GRANTING 18 Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Briefing Schedule. Motion to Remand is due by February 10, 2017. Response is due by April 13, 2017. Reply is due by April 27, 2017. (am)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO ELIZABETH JENNEY GUINN Plaintiff, vs. No. 1:16-CV-00689-SMV NANCY A. BERRYHILL,1 Acting Commissioner of the Social Security, Defendant. ORDER ON UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME THIS MATTER coming before the Court upon Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time, it being stated that opposing counsel concurs in the granting of the Motion, and the Court having read the Motion and being fully advised of the premises, IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff is granted through February 10, 2017, to serve her Motion to Reverse and Remand Administrative Agency Decision with Supporting Memorandum. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant is granted through April 13, 2017 to serve her Response, and Plaintiff through April 27, 2017 to serve her reply. HONORABLE STEPHAN M. VIDMAR UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 1 Nancy A. Berryhill is now the Acting Commissioner of Social Security. Pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Nancy A. Berryhill should be substituted for Acting Commissioner Carolyn W. Colvin as the defendant in this suit. No further action needs to be taken to continue this suit by reason of the last sentence of section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Submitted and Approved By: /s/Michael D. Armstrong Michael D. Armstrong Attorney for Plaintiff 220 Adams St. SE, Suite B Albuquerque, NM 87108 Bus. (505) 890-9056 Fax. (505) 266-5860 Email Approval on February 7, 2017 Manuel Lucero, AUSA United States Attorney's Office District of New Mexico P.O. Box 607 Albuquerque, NM 87103 (505) 224-1504 (505) 346-7205 fax 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?