Pinto v. Social Security Administration

Filing 29

ORDER by Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Fouratt granting 28 Unopposed Motion to Remand to Agency. The Court HEREBY REVERSES the Commissioner's decision under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and REMANDS this matter to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings. (kdj)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO CLAUDETTE PINTO, Plaintiff, v. Civ. No. 16-826 GJF NANCY BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant. ORDER THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendant’s “Unopposed Motion to Remand for Remand Pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g)” (“Motion”) [ECF No. 28]. Having reviewed the Motion, noted the parties’ concurrence, and found good cause for the relief requested, the Court HEREBY REVERSES the Commissioner’s decision under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and REMANDS this matter to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings. See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292 (1993). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, upon remand, the Social Security Administration’s Appeals Council will remand the matter to a new ALJ for a de novo hearing and new decision. On remand, the ALJ will reevaluate the treatment records and diagnoses from Thomas J. Faber, M.D., Valerie Wrangler, M.D., Joy McQuery, M.D., and Scarlett Soriano, M.D., and reevaluate at step two whether Plaintiff’s alleged fibromyalgia and mental conditions may be medically determinable impairments. IT IS SO ORDERED. ____________ THE HONORABLE GREGORY J. FOURATT UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?