Diab v. Doe et al

Filing 75

ORDER by Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Fouratt granting 74 Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to File Response. Response due by 2/16/2018. Reply due by 3/2/2018. NO FURTHER EXTENSION OF THESE DEADLINES SHALL BE ALLOWED. (kdj)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO RICHARD DIAB, Plaintiff, v. Civ. No. 16-1002 MCA/GJF FNU BACA, et al., Defendants. FINAL ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiff’s “Request to Respond to Defendants[’] Document 73” (“Motion”). ECF No. 74. Upon reviewing the record, the Court notes that on December 15, 2017, Plaintiff was ordered to file his response to Defendants’ Martinez Report [ECF No. 60] no later than January 12, 2018. ECF No. 69. Plaintiff elected not to do so, and instead filed numerous other documents [see ECF Nos. 65, 66, 70, 71, 72], none of which appear to be a response to Defendants’ Martinez Report. Defendants, in contrast, complied with the Court’s Order and filed their Reply on January 26, 2018. ECF No. 73; see ECF No. 69. Thus, to date, Plaintiff has failed to comply with this Court’s Order of December 15, 2017. By the filing of the instant Order, the Court hereby places Plaintiff on notice that continued failure to ignore Court Orders will result in consequences up to and including the dismissal of his case. Nevertheless, the Court will GRANT Plaintiff’s Motion and allow Plaintiff one final attempt to respond to Defendants’ Martinez Report. Plaintiff SHALL FILE his response to Defendants’ Martinez Report no later than February 16, 2018. Defendants shall have until March 2, 2018, to file a reply. 1 No further extensions of these deadlines shall be allowed. IT IS SO ORDERED. ________________________________________ THE HONORABLE GREGORY J. FOURATT UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?