Environmental Dimensions, Inc. v. EnergySolutions Government Group, Inc.

Filing 140

ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jerry H. Ritter granting 128 Motion for Attorney Fees (mlt)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO ENVIRONMENTAL DIMENSIONS, INC., A New Mexico Corporation, Plaintiff, v. CV 16-1056 WJ/JHR ENERGYSOLUTIONS GOVERNMENT GROUP, INC. (n/k/a Atkins Energy Government Group, Inc.), a foreign for profit corporation, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER This matter comes before the Court on ESGG’s Motion for Attorneys’ Fees Associated with Filing Motion to Compel Compliance with Court Order, [Doc. 128], filed April 19, 2019. This Motion for Fees comes pursuant to this Court’s Memorandum Opinion and Order, which found that EDi failed to comply with a previous discovery order and awarded sanctions to ESGG. As ESGG explains, [o]n March 29, 2019, the Court entered Memorandum Opinion and Order (Doc. 124), instructing ESGG to file “a motion seeking expenses” that is “supported by contemporaneous and meticulous time records as well as an affidavit establishing the reasonableness of the hours expended.” (Doc. 124). The Court further instructed the request “to reflect the Court’s earlier determination of prevailing market rates [see Doc. 102].” Id. [Doc. 128, p. 1]. ESGG filed the instant Motion as instructed, seeking $2,687.00 in expenses. EDi did not file a response. See Doc. 134]. As this Court has previously explained, EDi’s failure to respond to ESGG’s Motion has consequences. Pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(b), “[t]he failure of a party to file and serve a response in opposition to a motion within the time prescribed for doing so constitutes consent to grant the motion.” D.N.M.LR-Civ. 7.1(b). According to the Tenth Circuit, “local rules of practice, as adopted by the district court, have the force and effect of law, and are binding upon the parties and the court which promulgated them....” Smith v. Ford Motor Co., 626 F.2d 784, 796 (10th Cir. 1980) (citation and quotation omitted). Moreover, the Court has independently examined ESGG’s requested fees and find them to be reasonable. Accordingly, the Court will grant ESGG’s Motion, and award it the amount requested: $2,687.00. EDi shall make this payment within 30 days of the entry of this Order. IT IS SO ORDERED. ________________________ JERRY H. RITTER U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?