James v. District Attorney's Office, et al.
ORDER ADOPTING 11 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by District Judge Martha Vazquez GRANTING 8 Motion to Dismiss. Wherefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition (doc. 11 ) is ADOPTED. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED and Plaintiff's Complaint is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice. (gr)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
DARREN L. JAMES,
Civ. No. 16‐1183 MV/GBW
DISTRICT ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, et al.,
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S PROPOSED FINDINGS AND
This matter comes before the Court on review of the record. Plaintiff filed a
Complaint alleging violations of his rights under the United States Constitution
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Doc. 1. Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss on January
5, 2017. Doc. 8. On January 24, 2017, the Court granted a motion to stay the case until
the Court issued its ruling on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss. Doc. 10.
The Magistrate Judge filed a Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition
(PFRD) on March 24, 2017, recommending that Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss be
granted. Doc. 11. Plaintiff has filed no objections to the PFRD, and, upon review of the
record, I concur with the Magistrate Judge’s findings and recommendations.
Wherefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Proposed
Findings and Recommended Disposition (doc. 11) is ADOPTED. Defendants’ Motion to
Dismiss is GRANTED and Plaintiff’s Complaint is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?