Chavez v. Social Security Administration

Filing 26

ORDER granting in part 24 Motion for Attorney Fees by Magistrate Judge Carmen E. Garza. (atc)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO ISIDRO ROBERTO CHAVEZ, Plaintiff, v. No. CV 16-1189 CG NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant. ORDER AWARDING ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Opposed Motion for Attorney Fees Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, With Memorandum in Support, (Doc. 24), filed January 22, 2018, in which Plaintiff requests an award of attorney fees in the amount of $6,073.46. On February 2, 2018, the Commissioner filed a Stipulation for Award of Attorney Fees Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412, (Doc. 25), stating that the parties have agreed to an award of $5,450.00 in attorney fees. Having considered the motion, the stipulation, and the relevant law, the Court finds that Plaintiff’s motion should be GRANTED in part. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Opposed Motion for Attorney Fees Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, With Memorandum in Support, (Doc. 24), be GRANTED in part, and that attorney fees in the amount of $5,450.00 be awarded to Plaintiff pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). See Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 591-93 (2010) (providing EAJA fees are paid to the prevailing party, not the attorney). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if Plaintiff’s counsel receives attorney fees under both the EAJA and 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), Section 206(b) of the Social Security Act, Plaintiff’s counsel shall refund the smaller award to Plaintiff pursuant to Weakley v. Bowen, 803 F.2d 575, 580 (10th Cir. 1986). IT IS SO ORDERED. THE HONORABLE CARMEN E. GARZA UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?