Garcia v. Metropolitan Detention Center, et al.

Filing 32

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE by District Judge Kenneth J. Gonzales granting 30 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. Defendants may file a motion for an award of attorneys' fees and costs no later than 7/13/2017. (tah)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO JOSEPH GARCIA, Plaintiff, vs. Civ. No. 16-1294 KG/CG BERNALILLO COUNTY ex rel. METROPOLITAN DETENTION CENTER, et al., Defendants. ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE On May 9, 2017, the Honorable United States Magistrate Judge Carmen E. Garza entered an Order Granting Motion to Compel (Doc. 29) directing Plaintiff “to fully respond to Defendants’ discovery requests. Failure to comply with this order may result in dismissal of this action. Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(b)(2)(v).” Plaintiff did not respond to Defendants’ discovery requests. Consequently, on May 16, 2017, Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Comply With Discovery Obligations (Motion to Dismiss) (Doc. 30). Plaintiff has failed to respond to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff has also not filed any additional pleadings since termination of his attorney on March 24, 2017. (Doc. 26). This action will be dismissed without prejudice for three reasons. First, as previously warned, Plaintiff’s failure to obey the Order Granting Motion to Compel now results in dismissal of this action. Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(b)(2)(v). Second, Plaintiff’s failure to respond to the Motion to Dismiss constitutes consent to grant the motion. D.N.M. LR-Cv 7.1(b). Finally, the Court has the inherent power to dismiss an action for want of prosecution. Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 629-30 (1962); Shotkin v. Westinghouse Electric Mfg. Co., 169 F.2d 825, 826 (10th Cir. 1948); Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). For the above reasons, IT IS ORDERED that 1. the Complaint (Doc. 1-1) is dismissed without prejudice; and 2. Defendants may file a motion for an award of attorneys’ fees and costs within 30 days of the filing of this Order of Dismissal Without Prejudice. ___________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?