Varela v. Social Security Administration

Filing 30

STIPULATED ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar AWARDING attorney's fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act. (sg)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO ROSS EUGENIO VARELA, Plaintiff, vs. No. CV 17-0317 SMV NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ORDER AWARDING ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Stipulated Motion for Award of Attorney Fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act, (Doc. 29), filed June 25, 2018, in which the parties stipulate to awarding Plaintiff EAJA fees in the amount of $5,000.00. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff be awarded $5,000.00 in attorney fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). See Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 591–93 (2010) (providing EAJA fees are paid to the prevailing party, not the attorney). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if Plaintiff’s counsel receives attorney fees under both the EAJA and 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), Section 206(b) of the Social Security Act, Plaintiff’s counsel shall refund the smaller award to Plaintiff pursuant to Weakley v. Bowen, 803 F.2d 575, 580 (10th Cir. 1986). IT IS SO ORDERED. ___________________________________ STEPHAN M. VIDMAR United States Magistrate Judge Presiding by Consent Submitted by: s/ Francesca J. MacDowell Francesca J. MacDowell Attorney for Plaintiff Approved by email on June 25, 2018 by: Kathryn C. Bostwick, Special AUSA Attorney for Commissioner 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?