Morris v. Haynes

Filing 7

ORDER TO ANSWER by Magistrate Judge Carmen E. Garza. Answer due by November 29, 2017. (atc)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO ANTHONY JOHN MORRIS, Petitioner, v. No. CV 17-325 JP/CG RON HAYNES, Respondent. ORDER TO ANSWER THIS MATTER is before the Court, pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section2 254 Cases in the United States District Courts, on Petitioner’s application under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for writ of habeas corpus, (Doc. 1). The Court has examined Petitioner’s application and determined that it is not subject to summary dismissal. Accordingly, Respondent Ron Haynes is directed to file an answer, motion, or other response. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to forward copies of this Order and the application and supporting papers and exhibits, if any, to Respondent and the New Mexico Attorney General; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Respondent answer the application by November 29, 2017. Respondent’s answer shall advise, but is not limited to, whether Petitioner has exhausted his state court remedies as to the issues raised in the federal application. Respondent shall attach to his answer copies of any pleading pertinent to the issue of exhaustion which was filed by Petitioner in the sentencing court, the state district court, the state court of appeals and the state supreme court, together with copies of all memoranda filed by both parties in support of or in response to those pleadings. Respondent shall also attach to the answer copies of all state court findings and conclusions, docketing statements, and opinions issued in Petitioner’s state court post-conviction or appellate proceedings. The answer must describe the procedural history of each claim that Respondent contends is unexhausted and identify the State procedures that are currently available to Applicant. ________________________________ THE HONORABLE CARMEN E. GARZA UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?