Baca v. Social Security Administration
ORDER granting 19 Unopposed Motion for Attorney Fees by Chief Magistrate Judge Carmen E. Garza. (atc)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
No. CV 17-449 CG
NANCY A. BERRYHILL,
Acting Commissioner of the Social
ORDER AWARDING ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO
THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)
THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Stipulated Motion for Attorney
Fees Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, (Doc. 19), filed March 5, 2018, in
which the parties stipulate to an award of $4,762.80 in attorney fees and that Plaintiff
receive $400.00 in costs from the Judgment fund administered by the U.S. Department
of the Treasury.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff be awarded $4,762.80 in attorney
fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), and that Plaintiff
be reimbursed costs of $400.00 from the Judgment Fund administered by the U.S.
Department of the Treasury. See Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 591-93 (2010)
(providing EAJA fees are paid to the prevailing party, not the attorney).
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if Plaintiff’s counsel receives attorney fees
under both the EAJA and 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), Section 206(b) of the Social Security Act,
Plaintiff’s counsel shall refund the smaller award to Plaintiff pursuant to Weakley v.
Bowen, 803 F.2d 575, 580 (10th Cir. 1986).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
THE HONORABLE CARMEN E. GARZA
UNITED STATES CHIEF MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?