Gabaldon v. New Mexico Coalition to End Homelessness et al

Filing 26

ORDER ADOPTING Chief Magistrate Judge Molzen's Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition 25 granting 13 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and remanding case back to the Second Judicial District Court, Bernalillo County by Senior District Judge C. LeRoy Hansen. (bap)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO DAVID A. GABALDON, Plaintiff, v. CIV 17-0473 LH/KBM NEW MEXICO COALITION TO END HOMELESSNESS; “THE HOPE CENTER”’; “ST. MARTIN’S HOSPITALITY CENTER”; GSL PROPERTIES, INC.; LAS BRISAS; HUD DEPT. HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, Defendants. ORDER ADOPTING CHIEF MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION On May 30, 2017, the Chief Magistrate Judge filed her Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition (Doc. 25), in which she recommended that the Motion to Dismiss filed by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (Doc. 13) be granted and that this action be remanded to the Second Judicial District Court for the State of New Mexico in Bernalillo County. The proposed findings notified the parties of their ability to file objections and that failure to do so waives appellate review. As of today, no objections have been filed and there is nothing in the record indicating that the proposed findings were not delivered. Wherefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AS FOLLOWS: 1. The Chief Magistrate Judge’s Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition (Doc. 25) is ADOPTED; 2. The United States Department of Housing and Urban Development’s (HUD’s or United States’) Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) and Supporting Memorandum (Doc. 13) is GRANTED. 3. That this case is REMANDED to the Second Judicial District Court for the State of New Mexico in Bernalillo County. SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?