Caouette v. Bernalillo County Metropolitan Detention Center, et al.

Filing 14

ORDER TO CURE DEFECTS (re: Motion for Copies Free Process [Doc. No. 13]) by Magistrate Judge Kevin R. Sweazea. Cure Defects by 9/21/2017. (sls)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO DANIEL CAOUETTE, Plaintiff, vs. No. CV 17-00523 MCA/KRS BERNALILLO COUNTY METROPOLITAN DETENTION CENTER, Defendant. ORDER TO CURE DEFICIENCY Plaintiff Daniel Caouette has filed a Motion for Copies Free Process, in which he requests to proceed in forma pauperis. (Doc. 13). The Court determines that Plaintiff’s submission is deficient because it is not in proper form and does not include the information necessary for the Court to determine whether Plaintiff may proceed in forma pauperis in federal court under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Plaintiff must cure this deficiency within thirty (30) days from entry of this Order by submitting an Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs including a certified copy of Plaintiff’s inmate account statement for the 6-month period immediately preceding this filing. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). Failure to cure the designated deficiency within thirty (30) days from entry of this Order may result in denial of Plaintiff’s Motion for Copies Free Process without further notice. IT IS ORDERED that within thirty (30) days of entry of this Order, Plaintiff submit an Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs that includes a certified copy of Plaintiff’s inmate account statement for the 6-month period immediately preceding this filing; and the Clerk is directed to mail to Plaintiff a copy of this order and 2 1 copies of an Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs with instructions. _____________________________________ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?