Sekiya v. FBI et al
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL of case for failure to timely file an amended complaint by Chief Judge M. Christina Armijo. (bap)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
MIKKO T. SEKIYA,
No. 17cv531 MCA/LF
FBI, FACEBOOK, JAMES COMEY, MARK ZUCKERBERG,
FISA and NSA,
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL
THIS MATTER comes before the Court on pro se Plaintiff’s failure to timely file an
Plaintiff asserted invasion of privacy claims against Defendants Mark Zuckerberg and
Facebook alleging they have not shut down Plaintiff’s Facebook account which Plaintiff has not
been able to access for over three years. See Complaint, Doc. 1, filed May 8, 2017. Plaintiff also
alleged that Defendants James Comey, FISA and NSA have not stopped Zuckerberg and Facebook
from showing videos on Plaintiff’s Facebook account.
The Court dismissed the claims against Defendants Zuckerberg and Facebook in this case
without prejudice because they are immune to Plaintiff’s claims pursuant to the Communication
Decency Act, 47 U.S.C. § 230, which creates a federal immunity to any cause of action that would
make service providers liable for information originating with a third-party user of the service.
See Doc. 6, filed July 17, 2017. The Court also dismissed the claims against the FBI, James
Comey, FISA and NSA without prejudice for failure to state a claim. See Doc. 6. Having
dismissed all the claims in the Complaint, the Court dismissed the Complaint without prejudice,
granted Plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint, and notified Plaintiff that failure to timely file
an amended complaint may result in dismissal of this case without prejudice. See Doc. 6.
Plaintiff did not file an amended complaint by the August 8, 2017, deadline.
IT IS ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice.
M. CHRISTINA ARMIJO
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?