Van Pelt III v. Giesen et al

Filing 16

ORDER Setting Telephonic Status Conference by Magistrate Judge Kevin R. Sweazea. Telephonic Status Conference set for 1/10/2018 at 09:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Kevin R. Sweazea. (A courtesy copy of this order has been sent to Cynthia A. Kiersnowski and Teresa Isabel Leger who have not entered in this case but represent some of the respondents in another case.) (sls)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO ALVIN VAN PELT III, Petitioner, v. No. 1:17-CV-647-RB-KRS TODD GIESEN, Captain/Warden, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Office of Justice Services, Division of Corrections, BRIAN CORIZ, Governor, Kewa Pueblo, ESQUIPULA TENORIO, Lieutenant Governor, Kewa Pueblo, and JAVIN CORIZ, Tribal Official #4, Kewa Pueblo, Respondents. ORDER SETTING TELEPHONIC CONFERENCE THIS MATTER is before the Court sua sponte following a review of the record in the above-titled cause. The Court, being fully advised in the premises, FINDS and CONCLUDES that a telephonic status conference shall be held on January 10, 2018, on a trailing docket to begin at 9:00 a.m., to consider the appropriate manner to proceed in this case in light of the failure by Respondents Brian Coriz, Esquipula Tenorio, and Javin Coriz to answer. The parties shall call the Court’s “meet-me” line at (505) 348-2694 at 9:00 a.m. to connect to the proceedings. The referenced conference telephone line can only accommodate up to five (5) telephone calls at once, including the call-in to the telephone conference by the Court. In the event the number of calls into the telephonic scheduling conference will exceed four (4) from counsel and parties, counsel or parties pro se must contact the Court immediately so that alternative arrangements can be made. IT IS SO ORDERED. _____________________________ KEVIN R. SWEAZEA UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?