Barela v. City of Albuquerque et al

Filing 29

ORDER by Circuit Judge Paul Kelly, Jr. granting 27 ORDER on Motion to Extend; granting 28 Motion to Stay all but limited discovery. Plaintiffs response to Defendants summary judgment motion 16 is due no later than November 30, 2017, or earlier in accordance with the parties agreement. All discovery, other than the limited discovery agreed to by the parties concerning qualified immunity, is stayed until further order of the court. (rt)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO JACQUELYN BARELA, Plaintiff, v. THE CITY OF ALBUQUERQUE; and ALBUQUERQUE POLICE DEPARTMENT OFFICERS TIMOTHY WOLFFBRANDT and DANIEL GALVAN, in their individual capacities, No. 1:17-cv-00722-PJK-SCY Defendants. ORDER THIS MATTER comes on for consideration of Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion to Extend Deadline to File Response to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment Requesting Dismissal of the First, Second, and Third Causes of Action Contained in Plaintiff’s Complaint filed October 11, 2017, ECF No. 27, and the parties’ Joint Motion to Stay All but Limited Discovery Until Defendant’s Qualified Immunity Motion has been Decided filed October 11, 2017, ECF No. 28. Upon consideration thereof, the motions are granted, however, Plaintiff’s response to Defendants’ summary judgment motion is due no later than November 30, 2017, or earlier in accordance with the parties’ agreement. All discovery, other than the limited discovery agreed to by the parties concerning qualified immunity, is stayed until further order of the court. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 12th day of October, 2017 at Santa Fe, New Mexico. _____________________ United States Circuit Judge Sitting by Designation -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?