Pacheco v. Geisen et al

Filing 48

ORDER by Chief District Judge William P. Johnson ADOPTING Findings of Fact and Recommended Disposition. (mag)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO WAYLON PACHECO, Petitioner, v. No. 1:17-cv-749-WJ-KRS TODD GEISEN Captain/Warden, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Office of Justice Services, Division of Corrections, TIMOTHY BAILON, Tribal Official, Kewa Pueblo, ROGER CALABAZA, Tribal Official, Kewa Pueblo, in their Individual and Official Capacities, Respondents. ORDER ADOPTING PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court upon Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus for Relief from a Tribal Court Conviction Pursuant to 25 U.S.C. § 1303 (“Petition”), filed July 19, 2017 (Doc. 1). In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), the matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Kevin R. Sweazea who entered Proposed Findings of Fact and [a] Recommended Disposition (“PFRD”) (Doc. 47) on March 6, 2019. As detailed in the PFRD, Judge Sweazea recommended that the Court grant Petitioner’s Petition and vacate Petitioner’s underlying sentence and conviction. Judge Sweazea also notified the parties of their right to file written objections pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). Neither party objected to the PFRD and the deadline for so doing expired on or about March 20, 2019. Having reviewed the record, the Court determines that it will adopt the PFRD in its entirety, grant Petitioner’s Petition, and vacate Petitioner’s underlying sentence and conviction. Page 1 of 2 IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Proposed Findings of Fact and Recommended Disposition (Doc. 47) is hereby ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner’s Petition (Doc. 1) is hereby GRANTED and his underlying sentence and conviction are hereby VACATED. _____________________________________ CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?