Mayfield v. Morris et al

Filing 37

ORDER ADOPTING 32 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by District Judge Martha Vazquez; DENYING 21 Brief in Support of Petition Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 filed by Earl R. Mayfield. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner's Fourth Amended Petition Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 [Doc. 21 ] is DENIED, and this action is DISMISSED with prejudice. (gr)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
EARL R. MAYFIELD,
Petitioner,
v.

No. 17-cv-0891 MV/SMV

GREG MORRIS, TOM RUIZ,
and STATE OF NEW MEXICO,
Respondents.

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S
PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION
THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Magistrate Judge’s Proposed Findings and
Recommended Disposition (“PF&RD”), filed February 28, 2020. [Doc. 32]. On reference by the
undersigned, the Honorable Stephan M. Vidmar, United States Magistrate Judge, recommended
denying Petitioner’s Fourth Amended Petition Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 [Doc. 21], which was
filed by his attorney. At the request of Petitioner, Judge Vidmar granted extra time, until April 10,
2020, to object to the PF&RD. [Doc. 36]. Nevertheless, no party objected.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the
Magistrate Judge’s Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition [Doc. 21] are ADOPTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner’s Fourth Amended Petition Pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 2254 [Doc. 21] is DENIED, and this action is DISMISSED with prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
__________________________________
MARTHA VÁZQUEZ
United States District Judge