Edgell v. Social Security Administration

Filing 27

STIPULATED ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar GRANTING 26 Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Attorney Fees under EAJA (am)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO CHANO EDGELL, Plaintiff, vs. No. 17-CV-1192-SMV NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security Administration, Defendant. AGREED ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS UNDER EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT (EAJA) THIS MATTER having come before the Court upon Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion for Attorney Fees Under Equal Access to Justice Act (Doc. #26) the Court FINDS that the MOTION should be GRANTED. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that attorney fees be, and hereby are, awarded under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), payable to Plaintiff in care of her attorney in the amount of $4578.80. See Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 598 (2010) (EAJA fees are paid to the prevailing party, not the attorney). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT, if Plaintiff’s counsel receives attorney fees under both the EAJA and 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) of the Social Security Act, Plaintiff’s counsel shall refund the smaller award to Plaintiff pursuant to Weakley v. Bowen, 803 F.2d 575, 580 (10th Cir. 1986). DATED this _24th_ day of September 2018. _______________________________ The Honorable Stephan M. Vidmar United States Magistrate Judge Submitted by: s/ Feliz M. Martone Feliz M. Martone Attorney for Plaintiff Approved by: Email approval on 9/24/18 Laura Holland Attorney for Defendant 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?