Martinez v. Judd et al

Filing 7

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by District Judge Martha Vazquez. IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 41(b), the Prisoner's Civil Rights Complaint filed by Plaintiff Larry Martinez is DISMISSED without prejudice. (gr)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO LARRY MARTINEZ, Plaintiff, vs. No. CV 18-00041 MV/GJF BETTY JUDD, AND ALL OF HER SECURITY AND MEDICAL STAFF AS PERSONS WHO ARE LIABLE FOR THEIR ACTIONS, Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL THIS MATTER is before the Court sua sponte on the Prisoner’s Civil Rights Complaint filed by Plaintiff Larry Martinez (Doc. 1). The Court will dismiss the Complaint without prejudice for failure to comply with a Court Order and failure to prosecute this action. Plaintiff Martinez is an incarcerated prisoner. He filed his Civil Rights Complaint on January 12, 2018. (Doc. 1). Martinez did not pay the required filing fee or submit an application to proceed under § 1915. On January 17, 2018, the Court ordered him to cure the deficiency by submitting an application to proceed in the District Court without prepayment of fees or costs. (Doc. 3). Martinez then submitted his Application to Proceed together with his inmate account statement (Doc. 4). The Court granted the Application to Proceed in forma pauperis on January 26, 2018. (Doc. 5). The Court also required Plaintiff Martinez to make an initial partial payment of $23.17 or show cause why he should not be required to make the payment within 30 days of entry of the Order. (Doc. 5 at 1). 1    The inmate account statement shows that Martinez had an account balance sufficient to pay the initial partial payment, but spent his money on commissary purchases. (Doc. 5). See Shabazz v. Parsons, 127 F.3d 1246, 1248-49 (10th Cir. 1997). “[W]hen a prisoner has the means to pay an initial partial filing fee and instead spends his money on amenities at the prison canteen or commissary, he should not be excused for failing to pay the initial partial filing fee.” Baker v. Suthers, 9 F. App’x 947, 949 (10th Cir. 2001). Plaintiff Martinez did not pay the $23.17 initial partial payment or demonstrate why he should be relieved of the obligation to pay. On March 13, 2018, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause, ordering Plaintiff Martinez to show cause within 30 days why the Complaint should not be dismissed for failure to make the initial partial payment. (Doc. 6). More than 30 days have elapsed since entry of the Court’s March 13, 2018 Order. Plaintiff Martinez has not made the initial partial payment, shown cause, or otherwise responded to the Court’s March 13, 2018 Order. When a prisoner is granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis, Section 1915 provides: “The court shall assess and, when funds exist, collect, as a partial payment of any court fees required by law, an initial partial filing fee of 20 percent of the greater of (A) the average monthly deposits to the prisoner’s account; or (B) the average monthly balance in the prisoner’s account for the 6-month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint or notice of appeal.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1) (emphasis added). Plaintiff Martinez was ordered to make the required partial payment under Section 1915(b)(1) or show cause why the payment should be excused, but has failed to comply with the Court’s Order. The Court may dismiss an action under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to prosecute, to comply with the rules of civil procedure, or to comply with court orders. See Olsen v. Mapes, 333 F.3d 1199, 1204 n.3 (10th Cir. 2003). Martinez has failed to comply with the Court’s rules 2    and Order and has failed to prosecute this proceeding by not making the initial partial payment. The Court will dismiss this proceeding under Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for failure to comply with the Court’s Order and for failure to prosecute this action. IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 41(b), the Prisoner’s Civil Rights Complaint filed by Plaintiff Larry Martinez is DISMISSED without prejudice. ____________________________________ HONORABLE MARTHA VÁZQUEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE        3   

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?