Martinez-Chavez v. Wal-Mart Stores East Inc., et al

Filing 10

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar. Plaintiff's show-cause response is due by June 5, 2018. (am)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO VIRGINIA MARTINEZ-CHAVEZ, Plaintiff, v. No. 18-cv-0147 SCY/SMV WAL-MART STORES EAST INC. and THOMAS CARROLL, Defendants. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE THIS MATTER is before the Court sua sponte. Plaintiff filed her Complaint in state court on September 8, 2017. [Doc. 1-1] at 2–4. Defendant Wal-Mart Stores East, Inc., removed the case to this Court on February 13, 2018. [Doc. 1]. Plaintiff had 90 days from filing of the Notice of Removal, or until May 14, 2018, to effect service of process on Defendant Carroll. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) (deadline for service is 90 days) (2015); Wallace v. Microsoft Corp., 596 F.3d 703, 706–07 (10th Cir. 2010) (time to effect service of process begins to run once case is removed to federal court). There is no indication on the record that service of process has been effected with respect to Defendant Carroll. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff show good cause why her claims against Defendant Carroll should not be dismissed without prejudice for failure to comply with the service provision of Rule 4(m). See Espinoza v. United States, 52 F.3d 838, 841 (10th Cir. 1995). Plaintiff must file her response no later than June 5, 2018. IT IS SO ORDERED. ______________________________ STEPHAN M. VIDMAR United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?