Martinez-Chavez v. Wal-Mart Stores East Inc., et al

Filing 14

ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar DENYING as moot 11 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint and GRANTING 12 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File to file Amended Complaint. (am)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO VIRGINIA MARTINEZ-CHAVEZ, Plaintiff, v. No. 18-cv-0147 SCY/SMV WAL-MART STORES EAST INC., STORE #831, and THOMAS CARROLL, Defendants. ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT, AND TO DISMISS DEFENDANT THOMAS CARROLL WITHOUT PREJUDICE This matter having come before the Court on Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion for Leave to File Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint, and to Dismiss Defendant Thomas Carroll Without Prejudice, the Court finds: 1. The Motion is well-taken and is hereby granted; 2. Plaintiff may file her First Amended Complaint; 3. Defendant Thomas Carroll is hereby dismissed without prejudice; and 4. The Order to Show cause (Doc. 10) is moot. It is so ordered. Hon. Stephan M. Vidmar U.S. Magistrate Judge 1 Form of Order respectfully submitted by: GARRETT LAW By:___/S/ Aaron Garrett AARON GARRETT 6739 Academy Rd NE #350 Albuquerque, NM 87109 (505) 242-1920 – Telephone (505) 242-0508 – Facsimile Attorney for Plaintiff And by: JACKSON LAW, LLC /s/ Wesley C. Jackson Wesley C. Jackson Co-counsel for Plaintiff 1121 4th Street NW, Suite 1A Albuquerque, NM 87102 Tel: (505) 881-7676; Fax: (505) 998-6603 Email: Wes@LegalActionNM.com And approved as to form by: Modrall, Sperling, Roehl, Harris & Sisk, P.A. Approved via Email 5-31-18 Megal T. Muirhead, Esq. Tomas J. Garcia, Esq. Attorneys for Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P. 500 4th Street NW, Suite 1000 Albuquerque, NM 87102 Tel: (505) 848-1800 Email: megan.muirhead@modrall.com Tomas.garcia@modrall.com 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?