Garcia v. Bowen
Filing
5
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 4 Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by District Judge James O. Browning. (vv)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
MICHAEL GARCIA,
Petitioner
vs.
No. CIV 18-0269 JB/SMV
MARK BOWDEN, Warden,
Respondent.
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION TO
PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Petitioner’s Application to Proceed In
Forma Pauperis, filed June 1, 2018 (Doc. 4)(“Motion”). Petitioner Michael Garcia seeks to
prosecute his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas petition without prepaying the $5.00 filing fee. Pursuant
to the in forma pauperis statue, the Court may grant such relief only where a prisoner’s “affidavit
[and] . . . statement of . . . assets [demonstrates] that the [prisoner] is unable to pay such fees or
give security therefor.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). Garcia does not qualify under that test. He
receives $36.00 per month in wages, and his average monthly income from all sources is $88.80.
See Motion at 2, 5-6. The Court will therefore deny the motion, and Garcia must pay the $5.00
filing fee within thirty days of entry of this Order or show cause for his failure to comply.
Failure to timely comply with this Order may result in the dismissal of this action without further
notice.
IT IS ORDERED that (i) the Petitioner’s Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis,
filed June 1, 2018 (Doc. 4), is denied; (ii) Petitioner Michael Garcia must submit the $5.00 filing
fee within thirty days from entry of this Order or show cause for his failure to comply; and
(iii) the Clerk of the Court shall provide Garcia with two copies of this Order; and (iv) Garcia
shall make the necessary arrangements to attach one copy of this order to his check.
________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Parties:
Michael Garcia
Northeast New Mexico Correctional Center
Clayton, New Mexico
Petitioner Pro Se
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?