Thaxton v. GEICO Advantage Insurance Company et al

Filing 101

ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO RULE 41(a)(2) by District Judge Kea W. Riggs. Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as to the individual claims of Plaintiff, Michael Thaxton and DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as to the claims of the proposed, but not certified, class. (ve)

Download PDF
Case 1:18-cv-00306-KWR-KK Document 101 Filed 02/06/23 Page 1 of 1 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO 2 3 MICHAEL THAXTON, Case No. 1:18-cv-00306-KWR-KK Plaintiff, 4 v. 5 6 GEICO ADVANTAGE INSURANCE COMPANY, 7 Defendant. 8 ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO RULE 41(a)(2) 9 L.L.P. 201 THIRD ST. NW, SUITE 500 ALBUQUERQUE, NM 87102 SNELL & WILMER 10 11 12 13 14 15 Having considered Michael Thaxton’s (“Plaintiff”) and GEICO Advantage Insurance Company’s (“Defendant”) Joint Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint, the Court orders Plaintiff’s Complaint [Case No. 1:18-cv-00306-KWR-KK] DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as to the individual claims of Plaintiff Michael Thaxton and DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as to the claims of the proposed, but not certified, class. 16 IT IS SO ORDERED. 17 DATED: FEBRUARY 6, 2023. 18 19 _________________________________ KEA W. RIGGS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CASE NO. 1:18-CV-00306-KWR-KK JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO RULE 41 4867-0911-3678.2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?