Thaxton v. GEICO Advantage Insurance Company et al
Filing
101
ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO RULE 41(a)(2) by District Judge Kea W. Riggs. Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as to the individual claims of Plaintiff, Michael Thaxton and DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as to the claims of the proposed, but not certified, class. (ve)
Case 1:18-cv-00306-KWR-KK Document 101 Filed 02/06/23 Page 1 of 1
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
2
3
MICHAEL THAXTON,
Case No. 1:18-cv-00306-KWR-KK
Plaintiff,
4
v.
5
6
GEICO ADVANTAGE INSURANCE
COMPANY,
7
Defendant.
8
ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION
TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO RULE 41(a)(2)
9
L.L.P.
201 THIRD ST. NW, SUITE 500
ALBUQUERQUE, NM 87102
SNELL & WILMER
10
11
12
13
14
15
Having considered Michael Thaxton’s (“Plaintiff”) and GEICO Advantage Insurance
Company’s (“Defendant”) Joint Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint, the Court orders
Plaintiff’s Complaint [Case No. 1:18-cv-00306-KWR-KK] DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE
as to the individual claims of Plaintiff Michael Thaxton and DISMISSED WITHOUT
PREJUDICE as to the claims of the proposed, but not certified, class.
16
IT IS SO ORDERED.
17
DATED: FEBRUARY 6, 2023.
18
19
_________________________________
KEA W. RIGGS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
CASE NO. 1:18-CV-00306-KWR-KK
JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS
PURSUANT TO RULE 41
4867-0911-3678.2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?