Information Dock Analytics LLC et al v. Coughlin et al

Filing 27

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by District Judge Kenneth J. Gonzales. Show Cause Response due by 3/27/2019. (tah)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO INFORMATION DOCK ANALYTICS LLC, a Delaware Series Limited Liability Company; INFORMATION DOCK ANALYTICS LLC PROTECTED SERIES SHORT; INFORMATION DOCK ANALYTICS LLC PROTECTED SERIES MID; INFORMATION DOCK ANALYTICS LLC PROTECTED SERIES LONG; INFORMATION DOCK ANALYTICS LLC PROTECTED SERIES ISLAND; and INFORMATION DOCK ANALYTICS LLC PROTECTED SERIES MUTLI, Plaintiffs, vs. 18cv380 KG/KBM MICHAEL COUGHLIN and M. KAY COUGHLIN, Defendants. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE This matter is before the Court sua sponte. Plaintiffs Information Dock Analytics LLC, Information Dock Analytics LLC Protected Series Short; Information Dock Analytics LLC Protected Series Mid; Information Dock Analytics LLC Protected Series Long; Information Dock Analytics LLC Protected Series Island; and Information Dock Analytics LLC Protected Series Multi (collectively, Plaintiff-LLCs) are represented by James G. McMillan and Theodore A. Kittila, from Wilmington, Delaware. Mr. McMillan and Mr. Kittila appear pro hac vice, as attorneys licensed outside the District of New Mexico, pursuant to D.N.M.LR-Civ. 83.3(a). Local Rule 83.3(a) requires attorneys licensed outside the District of New Mexico to associate with an attorney admitted to practice in this District, and further requires the local attorney to “continue in the action unless another [attorney licensed to practice in this District] is substituted.” D.N.M.LR-Civ. 83.3(a)(1). Originally, Mr. McMillan and Mr. Kittila associated with Arash “Asher” Kashanian. (Docs. 4, 5). Mr. Kashanian was terminated as counsel effective July 9, 2018. Pamela Sullivan entered an appearance on January 22, 2019. (Doc. 25). However, Ms. Sullivan is not admitted to practice in this District. The Office of the Clerk of Court contacted Ms. Sullivan on or about January 29, 2019, and notified her to file a Petition for Admission and pay the filing fee. To date, Ms. Sullivan’s admission proceedings remain incomplete due to her failure to pay the filing fee. Therefore, Plaintiff-LLCs have proceeded without duly admitted counsel for over eight months. Local Rule 83.7 requires a “business entity other than a natural person . . . [to] be represented by an attorney authorized to practice before this Court.” IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED THAT Plaintiff-LLCs retain the services of an attorney admitted to practice in this District by March 27, 2019, or Show Cause in writing why this case should not be dismissed for failure to comply with the Local Rules. __________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?