Flores et al v. City of Farmington et al

Filing 131

ORDER FOR CLARIFICATION FROM PLAINTIFF PAT FLORES by District Judge Kea W. Riggs. Plaintiff, Pat Flores is hereby ordered to file a notice clarifying whether he asserts any Title VII claims under Counts V, VI, and VII within seven (7) days of the entry of this order. (ve)

Case 1:18-cv-00402-KWR-JFR Document 131 Filed 01/26/21 Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
___________________________
REYES FLORES, and
PAT FLORES,
Plaintiffs,
vs.

1:18-cv-00402-KWR-JFR

CITY OF FARMINGTON,
STEVEN HEBBE, NICK BLOOMFIELD,
MATTHEW VEITH, TOM SWENK, and
TAFT TRACY, all in their individual capacities,
Defendants.

ORDER FOR CLARIFICATION FROM PLAINTIFF PAT FLORES
THIS MATTER comes before the Court sua sponte. Plaintiff Pat Flores opposed a motion
for judgment on the pleadings on his Title VII claims. See Doc. 90. Subsequently, Defendants
represented in summary judgment briefing that Plaintiff’s counsel clarified that Plaintiff Pat Flores
does not bring any Title VII claims under Counts V, VI, and VII. Doc. 108 at 1. Plaintiff Pat
Flores did not respond to this representation in his response but also did not oppose summary
judgment of the Title VII claims. See Doc. 119.
Plaintiff Pat Flores is hereby ordered to file a notice clarifying whether he asserts any Title
VII claims under Counts V, VI, and VII within seven (7) days of the entry of this order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

______________________________________
KEA W. RIGGS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE