Mondragon v. Sena et al

Filing 17

ORDER ON PENDING MOTIONS by Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Fouratt. Plaintiff's 5 Motion for the Appointment of Counsel is DENIED. Planitiff's 13 Motion for Settlement is DENIED as premature. Plaintiff's 16 Motion for Trial is DENIED as premature.(gbg)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO FABIAN MONDRAGON Plaintiff, v. Civ. No. 18-430 JB/GJF DETECTIVE ALBERT SENA, et al., Defendants. ORDER ON PENDING MOTIONS THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Motion for the Appointment of Counsel [ECF No. 5], Motion for Settlement [ECF No. 13], and Motion for Trial [ECF No. 16] filed by Plaintiff Fabian Mondragon. For the reasons set forth below, the Court will DENY the Motions. 1. Motion for the Appointment of Counsel. There is no right to appointment of counsel in a civil rights case. Instead, the decision whether to request assistance of counsel rests in the sound discretion of the Court. Beaudry v. Corrections Corp. of America, 331 F.3d 1164, 1169 (10th Cir. 2003); MacCuish v. United States, 844 F.2d 733, 735 (10th Cir. 1988). In determining whether to appoint counsel, a court should consider the merits of the litigant’s claims, the nature and complexity of the factual and legal issues, and the litigant’s ability to investigate the facts and to present his claims. Hill v. SmithKline Beecham Corp., 393 F.3d 1111, 1115 (10th Cir. 2004). The Court has reviewed the complaint and subsequent filings in light of the foregoing factors. Plaintiff appears to understand the issues in the case and to be representing himself in an intelligent and capable manner. See Lucero v. Gunter, 52 F.3d 874, 878 (10th Cir. 1995). Accordingly, the Court will DENY the Motion for the Appointment of Counsel [ECF No. 5]. 2. Motion for Settlement and Motion for Trial. Because Plaintiff is a prisoner proceeding pro se a civil action against government officials, the Court is obligated to conduct a preliminary screening of the Complaint: The court shall review, before docketing, if feasible or, in any event, as soon as practicable after docketing, a complaint in a civil action in which a prisoner seeks redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. . . . On review, the court shall identify cognizable claims or dismiss the complaint, or any portion of the complaint, if the complaint— (1) is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted; or (2) seeks monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a) and (b). The Court has a similar obligation to screen the complaint when, as in this case, a pro se plaintiff is proceeding without prepayment of fees and costs: Notwithstanding any filing fee, or any portion thereof, that may have been paid, the court shall dismiss the case at any time if the court determines that— (A) the allegation of poverty is untrue; or (B) the action or appeal— (i) is frivolous or malicious; (ii) fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted; or (iii) seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Requests for service of process, discovery, settlement, trial, and submissions of proof are premature and unavailable prior to the Court’s completion of its screening obligation. See Jones v. Bock, 549 U.S. 199, 213-214 (2007). If Plaintiff’s Complaint is not dismissed on initial screening, the Court will enter further orders governing service of process, discovery, and scheduling. Therefore, as the Court has not completed initial screening of the Plaintiff’s complaint, it will deny Plaintiff’s Motion for Settlement [ECF No. 13] and Motion for Trial [ ECF No. 16] as premature and without prejudice. 2 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that (1) the Motion for the Appointment of Counsel [ECF no. 5] is DENIED, (2) the Motion for Settlement [ECF No. 13] is DENIED as premature; and (3) the Motion for Trial [ECF no. 16] is DENIED as premature. IT IS SO ORDERED. ______________________________________ THE HONORABLE GREGORY J. FOURATT UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?