Rehburg v. Bob Hubbard Horse Transportation, Inc.
Filing
43
ORDER ADOPTING 42 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by District Judge Martha Vazquez; DENYING 11 Motion to Remand to State Court. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Court adopts Magistrate Judge Ritter's PFRD [Doc. 42 ]. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion for Remand [Doc. 11 ], including Plaintiff's demand for alternative relief in the form of additional discovery of jurisdictional facts [Doc. 11 , p.9, 32], is denied. (gr)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
LISA M. REHBURG,
Plaintiff,
v.
No. 1:18-cv-00531-MV-JHR
BOB HUBBARD HORSE TRANSPORTATION, INC.,
Defendant.
ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S
PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION
On March 28, 2019, Magistrate Judge Jerry H. Ritter filed his Proposed Findings and
Recommended Disposition [Doc. 42], in which he recommended “that the Court hold that remand
is not required and that additional discovery on this jurisdictional issue is unnecessary.” [Id., p. 1].
The proposed findings notified the parties of their ability to file objections and that failure to do
so waives appellate review. As of today, no objections have been filed and there is nothing in the
record indicating that the proposed findings were not delivered.
Wherefore,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Court adopts Magistrate Judge Ritter’s
PFRD [Doc. 42]. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Motion for Remand [Doc. 11], including Plaintiff’s
demand for alternative relief in the form of additional discovery of jurisdictional facts [Doc. 11, p.
9, ¶ 32], is denied.
_________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?