Chavez v. New Mexico Corrections Department et al
Filing
111
STIPULATED ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar GRANTING 110 Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion to Extend Pretrial-Order Deadline. Plaintiff's portion of the proposed Pretrial Order is due to Defendants no later than October 8, 2021. Defendants' deadline to submit the proposed Pretrial Order to the Court remains October 29, 2021. (am)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
CHRISTOPHER CHAVEZ,
Plaintiff,
Case No. 20-CV-00812 KWR/SMV
v.
ABEL RENTERIA, JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2,
JOHN DOE 3, in their individual capacities,
ESTEVAN FLORES, in his official capacity,
NEW MEXICO CORRECTIONS DEPARTMENT,
Defendants.
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S UNOPPOSED MOTION
TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO PROVIDE PRETRIAL ORDER TO DEFENDANT
THIS MATTER came before the Court for consideration of the Plaintiff’s Unopposed
Motion to Extend Deadline to Provide Pretrial Order to Defendant. This Court reviewed the
Motion and arguments made therein and considered that the Motion is unopposed. Accordingly,
this Court finds that there is good case to amend the Scheduling Order as requested and the
Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion to Extend Deadline to Provide Pretrial Order to Defendant is welltaken and should be granted.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that:
A.
The Plaintiff’s deadline to provide his portion of the Pretrial Order to Defendant is
now due October 8, 2021.
B.
Defendants’ deadline to provide the Pretrial Order to the Court remains on October
29, 2021.
____________________________________
STEPHAN M. VIDMAR
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
APPROVED:
ROTHSTEIN DONATELLI LLP
/s/ Kate S. Thompson 10/5/2021
CAROLYN “CAMMIE” NICHOLS
KATE S. THOMPSON
and
PAUL LINNENBURGER
Lane + Linnenburger + Lane LLP
Attorneys for Plaintiff
KENNEDY, MOULTON & WELLS PC
/s/ Debra J. Moulton approved via email 10/5/2021
DEBRA J. MOULTON
Attorney for Defendants
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?