Chavez v. New Mexico Corrections Department et al

Filing 111

STIPULATED ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar GRANTING 110 Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion to Extend Pretrial-Order Deadline. Plaintiff's portion of the proposed Pretrial Order is due to Defendants no later than October 8, 2021. Defendants' deadline to submit the proposed Pretrial Order to the Court remains October 29, 2021. (am)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO CHRISTOPHER CHAVEZ, Plaintiff, Case No. 20-CV-00812 KWR/SMV v. ABEL RENTERIA, JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2, JOHN DOE 3, in their individual capacities, ESTEVAN FLORES, in his official capacity, NEW MEXICO CORRECTIONS DEPARTMENT, Defendants. ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO PROVIDE PRETRIAL ORDER TO DEFENDANT THIS MATTER came before the Court for consideration of the Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion to Extend Deadline to Provide Pretrial Order to Defendant. This Court reviewed the Motion and arguments made therein and considered that the Motion is unopposed. Accordingly, this Court finds that there is good case to amend the Scheduling Order as requested and the Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion to Extend Deadline to Provide Pretrial Order to Defendant is welltaken and should be granted. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that: A. The Plaintiff’s deadline to provide his portion of the Pretrial Order to Defendant is now due October 8, 2021. B. Defendants’ deadline to provide the Pretrial Order to the Court remains on October 29, 2021. ____________________________________ STEPHAN M. VIDMAR UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE APPROVED: ROTHSTEIN DONATELLI LLP /s/ Kate S. Thompson 10/5/2021 CAROLYN “CAMMIE” NICHOLS KATE S. THOMPSON and PAUL LINNENBURGER Lane + Linnenburger + Lane LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff KENNEDY, MOULTON & WELLS PC /s/ Debra J. Moulton approved via email 10/5/2021 DEBRA J. MOULTON Attorney for Defendants 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?