Galloway v. Dimon et al

Filing 5

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Related document(s): 1 Complaint. by Chief District Judge William P. Johnson. (cmm)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO ANN-MARIE GALLOWAY, Plaintiff, v. No. 1:22-cv-00661-WJ-KK JAMIE DIMON, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, mailed a document titled "Conditional Acceptance amended for second certified mailing group" to United States District Court Judge Kenneth J. Gonzales. See Doc. 1, filed July 19, 2022 (indicating a similar letter was also mailed to United States Magistrate Judge Karen B. Molzen, United States Bankruptcy Judge David Thuma and other persons not associated with the United States District Court for the District of New Mexico). The document, which appears to be a demand letter regarding a foreclosure of Plaintiff's property, was filed as a Complaint by the Clerk's Office. Plaintiff did not pay the $402.00 fee for instituting a civil action or filed an “Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Long Form)” ("Application"). United States Magistrate Judge Kirtan Khalsa notified Plaintiff: If Plaintiff intended to initiate a civil action with the Complaint, Plaintiff shall either pay the $402.00 fee or file an Application within 21 days of entry of this Order ... If Plaintiff does not wish to proceed with this action, she need not respond to this Order and the Court will dismiss this action. Order to Cure Deficiency, Doc. 3, filed October 17, 2022. Plaintiff did not pay the fee, file an Application or otherwise respond to Judge Khalsa's Order by the November 7, 2022, deadline. IT IS ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice. ________________________________________ WILLIAM P. JOHNSON CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?