Ruiz et al v. United States Postal Service et al
Filing
81
ORDER by District Judge Martha Vazquez ADOPTING 79 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. (cmm)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
KARINA PEREZ RUIZ, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
No. 1:23-cv-110 MV/KRS
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant.
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S
PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION
THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Magistrate Judge’s Proposed Findings and
Recommended (“PFRD”), (Doc. 79), finding that the settlement reached in this case is fair and in
the best interests of the minor Plaintiffs. The parties have not filed any objections to the PFRD,
thereby waiving their right to review of the proposed disposition. See United States v. One
Parcel of Real Prop., 73 F.3d 1057, 1060 (10th Cir. 1996). Furthermore, upon review of the
record, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge’s findings and recommendations.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT the Magistrate Judge’s Proposed Findings and
Recommended Disposition, (Doc. 79), is ADOPTED and:
1. The settlement, as outlined in the Guardian ad Litem’s Report, (Doc. 74), is approved as
being fair, reasonable, and in the best interest of the minor Plaintiffs;
2. The funds shall be distributed as outlined in the Guardian ad Litem Report, (Doc. 74);
3. The Guardian ad Litem is discharged of his duties;
4. Plaintiff’s Motion to Enforce Settlement, (Doc. 41), is DENIED as moot; and
5. Closing documents shall be filed within thirty (30) days of the entry of this Order.
MARTHA VÁZQUEZ
Senior United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?