Reyes v. Social Security Administration

Filing 19

ORDER by Chief District Judge Kenneth J. Gonzales granting 18 Unopposed Motion for Attorney Fees. (tah)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO EMMANUEL A.J. REYES, Plaintiff, vs. Civ. No. 24-00622 KG/GJF MICHELLE A. KING1, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant. ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT The Court, having reviewed the parties’ Unopposed Motion for Attorney Fees Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412 (Doc. 18), HEREBY ORDERS that attorney fees be, and hereby are, awarded under the EAJA, payable to Plaintiff but mailed to Plaintiff’s attorney in the amount of $4,968.60 in attorney fees. See 28 U.S.C. § 2412(c)(1). See Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586 (2010) (EAJA fees are paid to the prevailing party, not the attorney). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT, if Plaintiff’s counsel receives attorney fees under both the EAJA and 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) of the Social Security Act, Plaintiff’s counsel shall refund the smaller award to Plaintiff pursuant to Weakley v. Bowen, 803 F.2d 575, 580 (10th Cir. 1986). __________________________________________ CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Commissioner Martin O’Malley’s last day with the Agency was November 29, 2024, and Carolyn Colvin became Acting Commissioner. Subsequent to the appointment of Ms. Colvin, Michelle A. King was appointed Acting Commissioner of Social Security on January 20, 2025; thus, pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, “the officer’s successor is automatically substituted as a party.” 1 SUBMITTED AND APPROVED BY: Filed Electronically 1/24/25 Laura J. Johnson Attorney for Plaintiff Armstrong Johnson Law, LLC Electronically Approved 1/24/25 Michelle Verdis Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Office of Program Litigation - 6 Office of the General Counsel Social Security Administration 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?