Joshi Technologies International, Inc. v. Chi Operating, Inc.

Filing 151

ORDER Resetting Deadlines for Settlement Statements by Chief Magistrate Judge Carmen E. Garza. (atc)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO JOSHI TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, INC., Plaintiff, v. No. CV 15-467 KG/CG CHI ENERGY, INC., Defendant. ORDER RESETTING DEADLINES FOR SETTLEMENT STATEMENTS THIS MATTER is before the Court upon review of the record. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the deadlines for the upcoming settlement conference are amended as follows: 1. By September 13, 2019, Plaintiff’s counsel shall serve on Defendant’s counsel a concise letter that sets forth a settlement demand itemizing the principle supporting damages or other relief that Plaintiff asserts would appropriately be granted at trial. 2. By September 20, 2019, Defendant’s counsel shall serve on Plaintiff’s counsel a concise letter that sets forth a response to the settlement demand. 3. By September 25, 2019, each party shall provide to the Court: a. A copy of each letter that was sent to an opposing party; b. A confidential, concise letter containing an analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of its case; and c. Any video or audio recordings of the incident upon which this action is based. These materials may be submitted to the Court by facsimile transmission, (575) 528-1675, or email, garzaschambers@nmd.uscourts.gov. 4. Each of these letters typically should be five (5) pages or fewer, and counsel will ensure that each party reads the opposing party’s letter before the settlement conference. The pre-settlement status conference and settlement conference dates remain as set in the Order Setting Telephonic Status Conference and Settlement Conference, (Doc. 144). IT IS SO ORDERED. THE HONORABLE CARMEN E. GARZA CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?