Hamlett v. Social Security Administration
Filing
29
ORDER by District Judge Robert C. Brack ADOPTING 28 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS and Granting 18 Motion to Remand to Agency filed by Raymond Lawrence Hamlett (jjs)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
RAYMOND LAWRENCE HAMLETT,
Plaintiff,
v.
No. CIV-15-0725 RB/LAM
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner
of the Social Security Administration,
Defendant.
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S PROPOSED FINDINGS
AND RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION
THIS MATTER is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Lourdes A. Martínez’ Proposed
Findings and Recommended Disposition (Doc. 28) filed on December 8, 2016, which
recommended granting Plaintiff’s Motion to Reverse and Remand for a Rehearing with
Supporting Memorandum (Doc. 18) filed April 7, 2016. No party has filed objections to the
Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition (Doc. 28) and the deadline for filing
objections has passed. The Court has determined that it will adopt the Proposed Findings and
Recommended Disposition (Doc. 28); grant Plaintiff’s Motion to Reverse and Remand for a
Rehearing with Supporting Memorandum (Doc. 18); and enter a final judgment dismissing this
case with prejudice.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Proposed Findings and Recommended
Disposition (Doc. 28) are ADOPTED by the Court.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Reverse and Remand for a
Rehearing with Supporting Memorandum (Doc. 18) is GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case be REMANDED to the Commissioner for
further proceedings consistent with the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition
(Doc. 28) and that a final judgment be entered concurrently with this order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
__________________________________________
THE HONORABLE ROBERT C. BRACK
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?