Hamlett v. Social Security Administration

Filing 29

ORDER by District Judge Robert C. Brack ADOPTING 28 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS and Granting 18 Motion to Remand to Agency filed by Raymond Lawrence Hamlett (jjs)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO RAYMOND LAWRENCE HAMLETT, Plaintiff, v. No. CIV-15-0725 RB/LAM CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant. ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION THIS MATTER is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Lourdes A. Martínez’ Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition (Doc. 28) filed on December 8, 2016, which recommended granting Plaintiff’s Motion to Reverse and Remand for a Rehearing with Supporting Memorandum (Doc. 18) filed April 7, 2016. No party has filed objections to the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition (Doc. 28) and the deadline for filing objections has passed. The Court has determined that it will adopt the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition (Doc. 28); grant Plaintiff’s Motion to Reverse and Remand for a Rehearing with Supporting Memorandum (Doc. 18); and enter a final judgment dismissing this case with prejudice. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition (Doc. 28) are ADOPTED by the Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Reverse and Remand for a Rehearing with Supporting Memorandum (Doc. 18) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case be REMANDED to the Commissioner for further proceedings consistent with the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition (Doc. 28) and that a final judgment be entered concurrently with this order. IT IS SO ORDERED. __________________________________________ THE HONORABLE ROBERT C. BRACK UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?