Aguilar et al v. Management & Training Corporation
Filing
104
ORDER by District Judge William P. Johnson ADOPTING the Magistrate Judges 101 Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition. (mag)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
MARISELA AGUILAR, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
Civ. No. 16-050 WJ/GJF
MANAGEMENT & TRAINING
CORPORATION, doing business as MTC,
Defendant.
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S
PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION
THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Magistrate Judge’s Proposed Findings
and Recommended Disposition (“PFRD”) (Doc. 101) of Plaintiffs’ “First Amended Opposed
Motion and Memorandum in Support of Judicially Supervised Notice Under 19 U.S.C. § 216(b)”
(“Motion”) (Doc. 55). The PFRD was entered and served electronically on January 27, 2017.
The parties were notified that any objections were due within fourteen (14) days after the parties
were served with the PFRD pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), and that failure to file
objections constituted a waiver of their right to appellate review of the PFRD. Neither Plaintiffs
nor Defendant filed objections to the PFRD in the time allotted.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED AS FOLLOWS:
1. The Magistrate Judge’s PFRD (Doc. 101) is ADOPTED;
2. Plaintiffs’ proposed form of notice (Doc. 55-1) shall be amended in specific
conformity with the recommendations provided in the PFRD (Doc. 101) and now
adopted by this Order;
3. The parties shall file a joint proposed notice within ten (10) days of the filing of this
Order.
4. Defendant shall, within five (5) days of the filing of this Order, produce to Plaintiffs’
counsel an electronic file containing the names, last known addresses, and last known
telephone numbers of all potential opt-in plaintiff so that notice may be delivered.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
__________________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?