Gomez-Valencia v. United States of America
ORDER by District Judge Kenneth J. Gonzales Adopting Report and Recommendations re 15 Report and Recommendations and Finding 1 Motion to Vacate/Set Aside/Correct Sentence (2255 under Johnson v. USA) and 3 Appendix/Supplement filed by Jose Guadalupe Gomez-Valencia as Moot (jjs)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Civ. No. 16-725 KG/KK
(Cr. No. 15-1811 KG)
JOSE GUADALUPE GOMEZ-VALENCIA,
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S
PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION
THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Defendant/Movant Jose Guadalupe GomezValencia’s (“Defendant”) Motion Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct
Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody with Memorandum of Points and Authorities (Doc. 1)
(“2255 Motion”), and Motion for Relief (Doc. 3), filed June 27, 2016. United States Magistrate
Judge Kirtan Khalsa entered Proposed Findings and a Recommended Disposition (“PFRD”)
regarding Defendant’s Section 2255 Motion on June 30, 2017. (Doc. 15.) In her PFRD,
Magistrate Judge Khalsa recommended that the Court find the Defendant’s 2255 Motion was
moot because it no longer presents a case or controversy redressable by a favorable judicial
decision and that the Court dismiss the 2255 Motion without prejudice. (Id.)
The parties had until on or about Friday, July 14, 2017, to timely object to the PFRD.
(Doc. 15 at 6.) As of the date of entry of this Order, no objections have been filed; and, upon
review of the record, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge’s PFRD.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:
The Magistrate Judge’s Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition (Doc.
15) are ADOPTED as an order of the Court;
Defendant’s Motion to Vacate Judgment under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Doc. 1) and
Motion for Relief (Doc. 3) are MOOT; and
This case is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?