Elias v. Bieri et al
STIPULATED ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar GRANTING 7 Motion to Remand to the Third Judicial District Court. (am)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
STEVEN M. ELIAS,
NO. 2:17-CV-00785 SMV/GBW
MARK BIERI, M.D., and
RIO GRANDE UROLOGY, P.A.,
A Foreign Professional Association
Doing Business in New Mexico,
STIPULATED ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR REMAND TO STATE COURT
THIS MATTER, having come before this Court on Plaintiff Steven M. Elias’s Motion
for Remand and with stipulation of Defendants Mark Bieri, M.D., and Rio Grande Urology,
P.A., through their counsel of record, Remo E. Gay & Associates (Brendan O’Reilly), the Court
1. On January 4, 2017, Plaintiff filed a “Complaint for Violations of the Unfair
Practices Act, and Medical Malpractice Arising Out of Failure to Obtain Informed
Consent.” See, Case 1:17-cv-00785 Doc. 1-1 referencing underlying State Court
action, D-307-2017-00029 assigned to the Hon. Marci Beyer.
2. On July 31, 2017 Defendants filed a “Notice of Removal.” See, Case 1:17-cv00785 Doc. 1.
3. The Motion for Remand is well-taken and should be granted.
4. Accordingly, remand of this case to the Third Judicial District Court of the State
of New Mexico is required.
5. Each party has agreed to bear its own fees and costs.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED THAT the abovecaptioned case is remanded to the Third Judicial District Court, County of Dona Ana, State of
New Mexico for further proceedings with each party to bear its own costs and fees relating to the
Notice of Removal in the United States District Court for the District of New Mexico.
STEPHAN M. VIDMAR
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
STIPULATED AND AGREED:
Counsel for Plaintiff:
WILLIAM F. WEBBER, P.A.
By Electronically Approved – August 18, 2017
William F. Webber
Counsel for Defendants Mark Bieri, M.D., and Rio Grande Urology, P.A.
REMO E. GAY & ASSOCIATES, P.C.
By /s/ Brendan O’Reilly
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?