Cross Border Resources, Inc. v. Black Shale Minerals, LLC

Filing 16

ORDER by District Judge Kenneth J. Gonzales granting in part 15 Motion to Consolidate. (tah)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATED DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO CROSS BORDER RESOURCES, INC., Plaintiff, Civ. Nos. 17-1013 KG/SMV 17-1016 MV/CG v. BLACK SHALE MINERALS, LLC, Defendant. ORDER OF LIMITED CONSOLIDATION This matter comes before the Court on the Defendant’s Unopposed Motion to Consolidate (Motion), filed December 5, 2017. (Doc. 15). The parties seek to consolidate two contract actions that were removed from New Mexico’s Fifth Judicial District Court: Cross Border Resources, Inc., v. Black Shale Minerals, LLC , Civ. No. 17-1013 KG/SMV and Cross Border Resources, Inc., v. Black Shale Minerals, LLC , Civ. No. 17-1016 MV/CG. The parties agree the “actions …. involve common question[s] of law or fact,” as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 42(a). Counsel for Plaintiff has also advised that following consolidation, the parties intend to submit a stipulated order transferring venue to the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Texas (Texas Bankruptcy Court). The Texas Bankruptcy Court—which is currently presiding over Plaintiff’s Chapter 11 bankruptcy case—would then preside over all remaining issues. The Court agrees it is appropriate to consolidate the cases for the purpose of determining the proper forum and, if appropriate, transferring the cases to the Texas Bankruptcy Court. To the extent such actions implicate the automatic bankruptcy reference under 28 U.S.C. § 157, the Court withdraws the reference to rule on issues relating to consolidation and proper forum. See Administrative Order No. 84-0324 (referring the exercise of jurisdiction over all bankruptcyrelated filings to the Bankruptcy Court); 28 U.S.C. § 157(d) (“The district court may withdraw, in whole or in part, any case or proceeding referred under this section, on its own motion or on timely motion of any party, for cause shown.”). If and when the cases are transferred, any automatic bankruptcy reference will remain intact, and the Texas Bankruptcy Court may determine whether continued consolidation is appropriate. IT IS ORDERED: 1. The Motion to Consolidate (Doc. 15) is granted, in part. 2. Cross Border Resources, Inc., v. Black Shale Minerals, LLC , Civ. No. 17-1013 KG/SMV and Cross Border Resources, Inc., v. Black Shale Minerals, LLC , Civ. No. 17-1016 MV/CG are consolidated to determine issues relating to the proper forum. 3. Unless and until the cases are transferred, all future filings shall be filed under Civ. No. 17-1013 KG/SMV. ________________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Consolidation of the cases was approved by the following parties, although the Court made edits to the proposed stipulated order: HINKLE SHANOR LLP By: ___/s/ Richard E. Olson_____________________ Richard E. Olson P.O. Box 10 Roswell, NM 88202-0010 (575) 622-6510 (575) 623-9332 fax rolson@hinklelawfirm.com Attorneys for Plaintiff Cross Border Resources, Inc. GALLAGHER & KENNEDY, P.A. By: __/s/ Gene F. Creely, II_______________________ Gene F. Creely, II Germaine R. Chappelle 1233 Paseo De Peralta Santa Fe, NM 87501 (505) 982-9523 (505) 983-8160 fax gene.creely@gknet.com germaine.chappelle@gknet.com Attorneys for Defendant Black Shale Minerals, LLC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?