Balderrama v. City of Alamogordo et al
Filing
73
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kevin R. Sweazea granting Plaintiff a further extension of time to file a response to 39 Opposed MOTION for Summary Judgment Based on Qualified Immunity filed by City of Alamogordo, Margaret Paluch. Response now due on or before February 1, 2019. (cbf)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
EDWARDO BALDERRAMA,
Plaintiff,
vs.
Cause No.: 18-CV-00134 KRS/GBW
The CITY OF ALAMOGORDO and
MARGARET PALUCH, individually
and in her official capacity as acting
City Manager for the City of Alamogordo,
Defendants.
STIPULATED ORDER FOR FURTHER EXTENSION OF TIME
TO FILE PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT [DOC. 39]
THIS MATTER having come before the stipulation of the parties through counsel and
the Court being otherwise advised in the premises;
THE COURT FINDS:
1. This Court previously entered its order staying the time for Plaintiff to respond to
Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment in order to afford Plaintiff the opportunity to
take the deposition of a party. That deposition has been noticed but not taken.
2. Due to a subsequent discovery dispute, the deposition was cancelled until the Managing
Magistrate entered a further order.
3. After receiving the Court’s order allowing Plaintiff to proceed, the remaining deposition
will be taken on February 1, 2019.
4. Under the circumstances stated the motion is well taken.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED by the Court
that the time for Plaintiff to respond to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment is extended
until February 22, 2019.
_____________________________
KEVIN R. SWEAZEA
United States Magistrate Judge
Presiding by consent
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?