Burke v. Dona Ana County Detention Center et al

Filing 30

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar. Plaintiff Kenneth Burke's show-cause response is due no later than June 12, 2018. (am)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO KENNETH BURKE, Plaintiff, v. No. 18-cv-0261 MV/SMV DOÑA ANA COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, ENRIQUE VIGIL, KEN MIYAGISHIMA, KASANDRA GANDARA, GREG SMITH, GABRIEL VASQUEZ, JACK EAKMAN, GILL SORG, YVONNE FLOREZ, ARAMARK FOOD SERVICE, and FNU LNU, Defendants. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE This matter is before the Court sua sponte. The record reflects that certain mailings to Plaintiff Kenneth Burke were returned as undelivered [Docs. 25–28]. It appears that Plaintiff has been transferred or released from custody without advising the Court of his new address, as required by D.N.M.LR-Civ. 83.6, thus severing contact with the Court. Because Plaintiff has failed to comply with the Court’s local rules, he will be required to show cause why this action should not be dismissed. See Bradenburg v. Beaman, 632 F.2d 120, 122 (10th Cir. 1980) (“It is incumbent on litigants, even those proceeding pro se, to follow the federal rules of procedure. The same is true of simple, nonburdensome local rules . . .” (citation omitted)). Failure to comply with this Order may result in dismissal without further notice. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that, within 21 days from entry of this Order, Plaintiff must notify the Clerk in writing of his current address or otherwise show cause why this action should not be dismissed. ____________________________________ STEPHAN M. VIDMAR United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?