Mansfield v. Armendiaz et al
Filing
5
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by District Judge Judith C. Herrera dismissing case without prejudice for failure to prosecute this proceeding (baw)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
DAVID MANSFIELD,
Plaintiff,
vs.
No. CV 19-00403 JCH/GJF
UNIT MANAGER ARMENDARIZ, and
WARDEN PETERS,
Defendants.
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
THIS MATTER is before the Court under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) on the Prisoner’s Civil
Rights Complaint filed by Plaintiff David Mansfield, on April 29, 2019. (Doc. 1). The Court
dismisses this case without prejudice for failure to comply with statutes and Court Orders and
failure to prosecute.
Acting pro se, Plaintiff David Mansfield filed this civil rights proceeding under 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 on April 29, 2019. At the time he filed his Complaint, Mansfield was a prisoner
incarcerated at the Southern New Mexico Correctional Facility. (Doc. 1 at 1). Plaintiff did not
pay the $400.00 filing fee. On April 29, 2019, Mansfield also filed a Prisoner’s Motion and
Affidavit to Proceed Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (Doc. 2). The Court granted Mansfield leave to
proceed without prepayment of fees or costs, and ordered Mansfield to make an initial partial
payment of $6.86 under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b) on May 3, 2019. (Doc. 3). The May 3, 2019 Order
directed Mansfield to pay the initial partial payment of $6.86 or demonstrate why he should be
relieved of the obligation to make the payment within 30 days of entry of the Order. (Doc. 3).
1
More than 30 days elapsed after entry of the May 3, 2019 Order, and Plaintiff Mansfield
did not pay the initial partial payment or otherwise respond to the Order. The Court then entered
an Order to Show Cause on June 17, 2019. (Doc. 4). The Order directed Plaintiff Mansfield to
show cause why the case should not be dismissed for his failure to make the initial partial payment
required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b) and the Court’s May 3, 2019 Order. (Doc. 4). Plaintiff Mansfield
did not make the initial partial payment, show cause, or otherwise respond to the Court’s June 17,
2019 Order to Show Cause.
When a prisoner is granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis, § 1915 provides:
“The court shall assess and, when funds exist, collect, as a partial payment
of any court fees required by law, an initial partial filing fee of 20 percent
of the greater of (A) the average monthly deposits to the prisoner’s account;
or (B) the average monthly balance in the prisoner’s account for the 6-month
period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint or notice of appeal.”
28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1) (emphasis added). Plaintiff’s 6-month inmate account statement shows
that Plaintiff had an account balance sufficient to pay the initial partial payment, but spends his
money on commissary purchases. (Doc. 2). See Shabazz v. Parsons, 127 F.3d 1246, 1248-49 (10th
Cir. 1997). “[W]hen a prisoner has the means to pay an initial partial filing fee and instead spends
his money on amenities at the prison canteen or commissary, he should not be excused for failing
to pay the initial partial filing fee.” Baker v. Suthers, 9 F. App’x 947. 949 (10th Cir. 2001). Plaintiff
Mansfield has not paid the $6.86 initial partial payment or shown cause why he should be relieved
of the obligation to pay.
Pro se litigants are required to follow the federal rules of procedure, statutes, court orders,
and simple, nonburdensome local rules. See Bradenburg v. Beaman, 632 F.2d 120, 122 (10th Cir.
1980). The Court’s May 3, 2019 and June 17, 2019 Orders directed Plaintiff Mansfield to make
the required partial payment under § 1915(b)(1) or show cause why the payment should be
2
excused. (Doc. 3, 4). Plaintiff Mansfield has failed to make the initial partial payment, to comply
with the Court’s Orders, and to prosecute this case. The Court may dismiss an action under Fed.
R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to prosecute or to comply with statutes, the rules of civil procedure,
local rules, or court orders. See Olsen v. Mapes, 333 F.3d 1199, 1204, n.3 (10th Cir. 2003). The
Court will dismiss this case for Plaintiff’s failure to comply with 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b), and the
Court’s May 3, 2019 and June 17, 2019 Orders and for failure to prosecute this proceeding.
IT IS ORDERED that Prisoner’s Civil Rights Complaint filed by Plaintiff David
Mansfield, on April 29, 2019 (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED without prejudice under Fed. R. Civ. P.
41(b) for failure to comply with 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b), failure to comply with the Court’s May 3,
2019 and June 17, 2019 Orders, and for failure to prosecute this proceeding.
_______________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?