Mendez v. ONeill

Filing 15

SCHEDULING ORDER: by Magistrate Judge Kevin R. Sweazea. Discovery due by March 31, 2021. Motions related to discovery due by April 14, 2021. All other Pretrial Motions due by April 28, 2021. Proposed Pretrial Order due by June 11, 2021. (atc)

Download PDF
Case 2:20-cv-00780-GJF-KRS Document 15 Filed 10/13/20 Page 1 of 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO ELIZABETH MENDEZ, Individually and on Behalf of Minor Children M.H. and M.H., Plaintiffs, v. No. 2:20-CV-780 GJF/KRS MICHAEL E. ONEILL, Defendant. SCHEDULING ORDER THIS MATTER comes before the Court following a telephonic Rule 16 scheduling conference held on October 13, 2020. At the hearing, the Court adopted the parties’ proposed Joint Status Report and Provisional Discovery Plan, with slight modifications, as reflected in the dates below Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties shall adhere to the following discovery plan: (a) Maximum of twenty-five (25) interrogatories by each party to any other party with responses due thirty (30) days after service. (b) Maximum of twenty-five (25) requests for admission by each party to any other party with responses due thirty (30) days after service. (c) Maximum of twenty-five (25) requests for production by each party to any other party with responses due thirty (30) days after service (d) Maximum of ten (10) depositions per side. Each deposition (other than of Plaintiff and experts) shall not exceed four (4) hours unless extended by agreement. Scheduling Order Page 1 of 3 Case 2:20-cv-00780-GJF-KRS Document 15 Filed 10/13/20 Page 2 of 3 Depositions of Plaintiff and experts limited to seven (7) hours unless extended by agreement. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the following case management deadlines shall govern: (a) Deadline for Plaintiffs to amend pleadings pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15: October 30, 2020; (b) Deadline for Plaintiffs to join parties pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15: October 30, 2020 (c) Deadline for Defendant to amend pleadings pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15: November 20, 2020; (d) Deadline for Defendant to join parties pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15: November 20, 2020 (e) Plaintiffs’ expert-disclosure deadline: January 15, 2021; (f) Defendant’s expert-disclosure deadline: February 26, 2021; (g) Deadline for supplementing discovery/disclosures: March 31, 2021; (h) Termination of discovery: March 31, 2021; (i) Motions relating to discovery: April 14, 2021; (j) All other motions: April 28, 2021; (k) Pretrial order: Plaintiff to Defendant by: May 28, 2021; Defendant to Court by: June 11, 2021. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court must approve any changes to the timing or scope of discovery, other than the parties’ agreement to extend the length of a deposition made during the deposition in question. Requests by a party to change the timing or scope of Scheduling Order Page 2 of 3 Case 2:20-cv-00780-GJF-KRS Document 15 Filed 10/13/20 Page 3 of 3 discovery, other than a mutual agreement to extend a deposition reached during the deposition, must be made by motion and before the termination of discovery or the expiration of any applicable deadline. Discovery must be completed on or before the termination of the discovery deadline. A written discovery request must be propounded by a date which ensures that the response to that request is due on or before the discovery deadline. The parties are further reminded that the cutoff for motions related to discovery does not relieve the party of the twentyone (21) day time period under Local Rule 26.6 to challenge a party’s objections to answering discovery. The parties are encouraged to review Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2) to ensure they properly disclose all testifying witnesses, not just those for whom a report is required. ______________________________ KEVIN R. SWEAZEA UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Scheduling Order Page 3 of 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?