Potter v. Torres et al

Filing 35

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' UNOPPOSED MOTION TO DISMISS COUNT I FOR FALSE ARREST by District Judge Kea W. Riggs. The 34 Unopposed Motion to Dismiss Count I for False Arrest is GRANTED. Count I is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Each party shall bear his/her/its own legal costs and fees incurred in the dismissal of this Count. (ve)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO MURRAY POTTER, Plaintiff, v. No. 2:20-cv-00823-KWR-KRS DETECTIVE FRANK TORRES, and CITY OF LAS CRUCES, Defendants. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ UNOPPOSED MOTION TO DISMISS COUNT I FOR FALSE ARREST THIS MATTER came before this Court on Defendants, Detective Frank Torres’ and City of Las Cruces’ (collectively “Defendants”) Unopposed Motion to Dismiss Count I for False Arrest with Prejudice. The Court has reviewed the Motion, and arguments and supporting authorities cited therein and considered that Plaintiff does not oppose the relief sought by Defendants. Accordingly, this Court finds that Defendants’ Unopposed Motion to Dismiss Count I for False Arrest is WELL-TAKEN and should be GRANTED. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that: A. Count I is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. B. Each Party shall bear his/her/its own legal costs and fees incurred in the dismissal of this Count. ____________________________________ KEA W. RIGGS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Submitted by: ROBLES, RAEL & ANAYA By: /s/ Philomena Hausler Philomena Hausler Luis Robles 500 Marquette Ave., NW, Suite 700 Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102 (505) 242-2228 (telephone) (505) 242-1106 (facsimile) luis@roblesrael.com philomena@roblesrael.com Attorneys for City Defendants Approved by: Via email on July 13, 2021 Margaret Strickland MCGRAW & STRICKLAND, LLC 165 West Lucero Ave. Las Cruces, NM 88005 (575) 523-4321 margaret@lawfirmnm.com Attorney for Plaintiff 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?