Potter v. Torres et al
Filing
35
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' UNOPPOSED MOTION TO DISMISS COUNT I FOR FALSE ARREST by District Judge Kea W. Riggs. The 34 Unopposed Motion to Dismiss Count I for False Arrest is GRANTED. Count I is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Each party shall bear his/her/its own legal costs and fees incurred in the dismissal of this Count. (ve)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
MURRAY POTTER,
Plaintiff,
v.
No. 2:20-cv-00823-KWR-KRS
DETECTIVE FRANK TORRES,
and CITY OF LAS CRUCES,
Defendants.
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’
UNOPPOSED MOTION TO DISMISS COUNT I FOR FALSE ARREST
THIS MATTER came before this Court on Defendants, Detective Frank Torres’ and City
of Las Cruces’ (collectively “Defendants”) Unopposed Motion to Dismiss Count I for False Arrest
with Prejudice. The Court has reviewed the Motion, and arguments and supporting authorities
cited therein and considered that Plaintiff does not oppose the relief sought by Defendants.
Accordingly, this Court finds that Defendants’ Unopposed Motion to Dismiss Count I for False
Arrest is WELL-TAKEN and should be GRANTED.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that:
A.
Count I is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
B.
Each Party shall bear his/her/its own legal costs and fees incurred in the dismissal
of this Count.
____________________________________
KEA W. RIGGS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Submitted by:
ROBLES, RAEL & ANAYA
By:
/s/ Philomena Hausler
Philomena Hausler
Luis Robles
500 Marquette Ave., NW, Suite 700
Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102
(505) 242-2228 (telephone)
(505) 242-1106 (facsimile)
luis@roblesrael.com
philomena@roblesrael.com
Attorneys for City Defendants
Approved by:
Via email on July 13, 2021
Margaret Strickland
MCGRAW & STRICKLAND, LLC
165 West Lucero Ave.
Las Cruces, NM 88005
(575) 523-4321
margaret@lawfirmnm.com
Attorney for Plaintiff
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?