Strege v. New Mexico Supreme Court et al
Filing
16
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kevin R. Sweazea granting 14 Plaintiff's Motion to Electronically File Documents (ldm)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
ADAM STREGE,
Plaintiff,
v.
No. 2:24-cv-00966-WJ-KRS
SUPREME COURT NEW MEXICO, et al.
Defendants.
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO FILE ELECTRONICALLY
Plaintiff filed a “Motion to Electronically File Documents and Court to Email Documents
with Pacer” on the grounds that he has not received previously filed Orders in this case because
they were lost in the mail or due to mail theft. Doc. 14, filed December 23, 2024.
The Court grants Plaintiff permission to file electronically using CM/ECF in this case only.
See CM/ECF Administrative Procedures Manual § 4(b)(1) (Rev. June 2024) (“Upon receipt of a
Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF), the recipient will have one opportunity to review, save, and
print the document without incurring any PACER fees”). The Court will revoke permission to file
electronically if Plaintiff abuses his electronic filing privilege or fails to comply with the rules and
procedures in the District of New Mexico’s Guide for Pro Se Litigants and the District of New
Mexico’s CM/ECF Administrative Procedures Manual. Account registration forms, procedure
manuals,
and
other
information
can
be
obtained
at
the
Court’s
website
at
http://www.nmd.uscourts.gov/filing-information. This Order only grants Plaintiff permission to
participate in CM/ECF; Plaintiff is responsible for registering to become a participant. See
CM/ECF Administrative Procedures Manual, District of New Mexico (Revised June 2024).
IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Electronically File Documents and Court to
Email Documents with Pacer, Doc. 14, filed December 23, 2024, is GRANTED.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 3rd day of January, 2025.
__________________________________
KEVIN R. SWEAZEA
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?