Kap-Kirwok v. Calibre Post Acute, LLC et al

Filing 5

ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kevin R. Sweazea. Plaintiff shall, within twenty-one days of entry of this Order, have an attorney authorized to practice in this Court enter an appearance to participate in this case on behalf of Plaintiff. Failure to timely comply with this Order may result in dismissal of this case. See attached Order for further details. (ldm)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO SAFARI HEALTHCARE ASSSOCIATE LLC, Plaintiff, v. No. 2:25-cv-00062-KRS BEECAN HEALTH LLC and CALIBRE POST ACUTE LLC, Defendants. ORDER REGARDING REPRESENTATION This case arises from a breach of contract between Plaintiff and Defendants. See Complaint at 14-15, Doc. 1, filed January 22, 2025 (the “Contract Agreement” attached to the Complaint indicates the agreement is between Calibre Post-Acute and Safari Healthcare Associates). “Plaintiff SAFARI HEALTHCARE ASSOCIATE is a corporation established in New Mexico.” Complaint at 2, ¶ 8. The Complaint was filed by Nelson Kap-kirwok “Pro se for Plaintiff Safari Healthcare Associate.” Complaint at 1. Rule 83.7 of the District of New Mexico’s Local Rules of Civil Procedure states: “A corporation, partnership or business entity other than a natural person must be represented by an attorney authorized to practice before this Court.” D.N.M.LR-Civ. 83.7. Mr. Kap-kirwok is not an attorney authorized to practice before this Court. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff shall, within 21 days of entry of this Order, have an attorney authorized to practice in this Court enter an appearance to participate in this case on behalf of Plaintiff. Failure to timely comply with this Order may result in dismissal of this case. IT IS SO ORDERED this 27th day of January, 2025. __________________________________ KEVIN R. SWEAZEA UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?