New Mexico State of, et al v. Eduardo Abeyta, et al
Filing
6026
ORDER REFERRING CASE by District Judge Kea W. Riggs. This case is referred to MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN F. ROBBENHAAR to conduct hearings, if warranted, including evidentiary hearings, and to perform any legal analysis required to recommend to the Court an ultimate disposition of the case. (ve)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
STATE OF NEW MEXICO, ex rel.
STATE ENGINEER, et al,
Plaintiffs,
No. 6:69-cv-07896-KWR-JFR
Rio Pueblo de Taos Adjudication
v.
EDUARDO ABEYTA, et al, and
CELSO ARELLANO, et al,
CONSOLIDATED WITH
69-cv-07939-MV
Rio Hondo Adjudication
Defendants.
ORDER REFERRING CASE
Pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B), (b) (3) and Virginia Beach Federal
Savings & Loan Association v. Wood, 901 F.2d 849 (10th Cir. 1990), this case is referred to
MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN F. ROBBENHAAR to conduct hearings, if warranted,
including evidentiary hearings, and to perform any legal analysis required to recommend to the
Court an ultimate disposition of the case.
The Magistrate Judge shall submit an analysis,
including findings of fact, if necessary, and recommended disposition, to the District Judge
assigned to the case, with copies provided to the parties.
The parties shall be given the
opportunity to object to the proposed findings, analysis and disposition as described in 28 U.S.C.
§ 636(b)(1).
Objections shall be filed within fourteen (14) days of the date of entry of the
proposed disposition.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
_________________________________
KEA W. RIGGS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?