In Re: State Of NM, et al v. Aragon, et al
Filing
11666
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by District Judge Kea W. Riggs GRANTING 11664 MOTION for Summary Judgment Regarding Water Rights on the A.E. Garcia ditch, Section 3 Canjilon Creek, Subfile NO. CHCJ-006-0001 filed by State of New Mexico. (cab)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
STATE OF NEW MEXICO ex rel.
State Engineer, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
69cv07941 KWR/KK
Rio Chama Adjudication
v.
Section 3:
Canjilon Creek
Subfile No.:
CHCJ-006-0001
ROMAN ARAGON, et al.,
Defendants.
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
GRANTING NEW MEXICO’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
REGARDING WATER RIGHTS ON THE A.E. GARCIA DITCH
THIS MATTER is before the Court on the State of New Mexico’s Motion for Summary
Judgment Regarding Water Rights on the A.E. Garcia Ditch, Doc. 11664, filed February 22, 2024
(“Motion”).
The State of New Mexico seeks summary judgment against Defendants Abelardo E. Garcia
and Geralding E. Garcia (“Garcias”) regarding the priority date for their water rights served by the
A.E. Garcia ditch, which diverts water from Canjilon Creek. See State of New Mexico’s
Memorandum in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment at 1, Doc. 11664-1, filed February 22,
2024 (“Memorandum”). The Garcias dispute the State’s proposed priority date of 1900 for their
adjudicated water rights described in Subfile No. CHCJ-006-0001. See Memorandum at 1. The
Garcias seek a priority date of 1882 for their water rights. See Memorandum at 2-5 (describing
the procedural history and discovery regarding the priority date for the Garcias’ water rights).
In support of its Motion, the State submitted the Affidavit of Chris Baker, Ph.D. See Doc.
11664-5 (“Affidavit”). Dr. Baker holds Ph.D. in History from the University of Colorado at
Boulder and has experience doing historical research and analysis of water rights and acequias.
See Doc. 11664-9, Curriculum Vitae of Steven Christopher Baker, PhD. Dr. Baker reviewed the
following documents which the State attached to its Motion:
(i)
Rio Chama Hydrographic Survey, Canjilon Creek Section, Mapsheet 6, State of
New Mexico, Office of the State Engineer (July 14, 2000), Doc. 11664-2;
(ii)
Order Granting Default Judgement, Subfile No. CHCJ-006-0001, Doc. 11664-3;
(iii)
1883 General Land Office survey plat, Doc. 11664-4;
(iv)
1882 General Land Office survey Field Notes, Doc. 11664-6;
(v)
W.W. Follett, A study of the Use of Water for Irrigation on the Rio Grande del
Norte above Fort Quitman, Texas, (November 1896), Doc. 11664-7;
(vi)
Tomas Martinez Homestead (October 12, 1905), Doc. 11664-8.
Based on his review of these documents, Dr. Baker found:
(i)
The 1883 General Land Office survey showed “there were no settlers or
improvements noted” in the area served by the A.E. Garcia ditch;
(ii)
The 1882 Field Notes for the General Land Office survey “did not describe any
acéquias or cultivated lands” in the area served by the A.E. Garcia ditch;
(iii)
The 1896 Follett Report “included four irrigation ditches for Canjilon Creek, none
of which were in” the area served by the A.E. Garcia ditch;
(iv)
“Settlement in the area under consideration began in 1900, when Tomás Martinez
claimed a homestead;”
(v)
“The ditch now known as the A.E. Garcia Ditch was established to irrigate
approximately 6 acres in the homestead claim of Tomás Martinez in 1900.”
Affidavit at 2-3, ¶¶ 9-13.
The Garcias did not file a response opposing the State’s Motion seeking summary judgment
2
determining that the priority date for the A.E. Garcia ditch and Abelardo E. Garcia and Geraldine
E. Garcia’s water rights described in Subfile No. CHCJ-006-0001, which are served by the A.E.
Garcia ditch, have a priority date of 1900.
The Court grants the State’s Motion. The State has presented evidence that water was first
put to beneficial use on the lands served by the A.E. Garcia ditch in 1900. The Garcias have not
cited to any parts of the record showing that there is a genuine dispute regarding the State’s
proposed priority date of 1900 for the A.E. Garcia ditch and the Garcias’ water rights. See
Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(a) (“The court shall grant summary judgment if the movant shows that there is
no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of
law”); Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c) (“A party asserting that a fact cannot be or is genuinely disputed must
support the assertion by . . . citing to particular pars of materials in the record . . . or showing that
the materials cited do not establish the absence or presence of a genuine dispute”).
IT IS ORDERED that the State of New Mexico’s Motion for Summary Judgment
Regarding Water Rights on the A.E. Garcia Ditch, Doc. 11664, filed February 22, 2024, is
GRANTED.
__/s/______________________________
KEA W. RIGGS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?